论文部分内容阅读
中国近代学术界的学分南北,在后来主流的叙述中,隐然成为新旧的同义词,并有连续的人脉关系,化作成见与心结,继续操控学界的动向。实则南北各有新旧,一般学人也不作此是彼非,壁垒森严的划线。出身北京大学而非新文化派的金毓黻,凭借1920年代下半期尤其是迁都以来的南北学界对流之风,入主南派大本营的中央大学历史学系。因应国内外学风转移,以及个人阅历学识的增长,其观念与人事均主张融会贯通,捐弃各执一偏的极端,回归学术的大道本原。
In the later mainstream narratives, the credits of modern Chinese academia, both north and south, suddenly become synonymous with old and new, and have continuous connections, stereotypes and knots, and continue to control the trend of academia. In fact, there are old and new in both the north and the south. In general, scholars do not make this as their own basis and they have strict barriers. Kim Yu-woo, a graduate of Peking University rather than a new cultural school, relied on the convection style of the North-South academic circle since the relocation of the capital in the second half of the 1920s and entered the Department of History of Central University at the headquarters of the Southern School. In response to the shift of academic styles both at home and abroad, as well as the growth of personal experience, his ideas and personnel advocated a thorough understanding of what is going on, and donated the extreme one that pursues one’s course and returns to the original essence of one’s academic path.