论文部分内容阅读
把《孔子诗论》同《左传》、《国语》所反映的诗学观念相比较,二者有三个相同之处:对诗的本质的认识和对风、雅、颂的认识是一致的;都采用“断章取义”的解诗方法;乃至对一些具体作品的解释也是一致的。这表明春秋时期的解《诗》用《诗》之风,不但是《诗论》产生的土壤,也给其形成提供了充足的条件。同时二者又有三个不同之处,即点滴论述和自成体系的不同;断章取义和评论篇旨的不同;大、小雅并重和国风、小雅并重的不同。这表明《诗论》是在更高的水平上评论作品,是对春秋时期诗学思想的重大超越。
Comparing Confucian Poetics with the poetic concepts reflected in Zuo Zhuan and Guoyu has three similarities: the understanding of the essence of poetry is consistent with the understanding of the wind, the grace, and the praise ; All use the “out of context” interpretation of poetic methods; and even the interpretation of some specific works is also consistent. This shows that in the Spring and Autumn Period, the solution to the poem by the poem is not only the soil produced by the Poetics but also provides enough conditions for its formation. At the same time there are three differences between the two, namely, bit by bit description and self-contained system is different; out of context and commentary articles purpose different; large and small Ya and the country wind, both small and elegant difference. This shows that “Poetics” is a commentary on works at a higher level, which is a significant transcendence of the poetic thoughts in the Spring and Autumn Period.