论文部分内容阅读
航空史上的各种“第一”,作为一种纪录,必须有准确可靠的证明材料,必须是公认的。在研究航空作战史的过程中所引用的各种纪录,通常应该是交战双方认可的,对单方提出的纪录,应有确凿的证据,才能予以认可。大量事实早已说明,单方提出的战果报告,往往有很大误差.例如美国一直认为在朝鲜战争中击落我方飞机约1000架,而实际情况是中国人民志愿空军被击落231架,苏联空军被击落345架,朝鲜人民空军参战飞机一共只有150架。即使在科学技术高度发达,探测和统计手段都十分完善的今天,海湾战争的单方战果报告也是误差很大的.所幸的是,包括中国在内的许多国家已将大量军事历史资料解密公开,使人们能够对照分析,去粗取精,去伪存真。
All kinds of “firsts” in the history of aviation should, as a kind of record, have accurate and reliable supporting materials and must be recognized. The various records quoted in the course of studying the history of aviation operations should generally be recognized by both warring sides. Only the evidence submitted by the unilateral parties should have solid evidence before they can be approved. A large number of facts have already indicated that there are often great errors in the reports of unilateral results, for example, the United States has always believed that about 1,000 aircraft were shot down in the Korean War. The actual situation was that the Chinese People’s Volunteers Air Force was shot down by 231 aircraft and the Soviet Air Force was shot down 345 aircraft, the Korean People’s Air Force participated in a total of only 150 aircraft. Even today, with highly developed science and technology and sound exploration and statistical means, the unilateral reports of the Gulf War have been erroneously large. Fortunately, many countries, including China, have already uncovered a large amount of military historical data to make it public. People can be comparative analysis, to crude and refined, to pseudo-true.