论文部分内容阅读
我国民事诉讼法虽然规定了证据规则,但尚未建立证明妨碍制度。尽管最高人民法院制定的《关于民事诉讼证据的若干规定》和2015年2月4日起实施的新民诉法解释弥补了民事诉讼法律的这一缺陷,对证明妨碍作出了具体的规定,但这些远远不足以保护知识产权的权利人的合法权益。在侵权人掌控了对其不利而对知识产权权利人有利的证据时,其拒绝履行协助提交证据义务的行为,不仅妨碍了知识产权案件的公平、公正的审理,还严重违背了诚实信用原则,甚至可能还会造成司法资源的极大浪费,损害司法机关的威信。因此,建立证明妨碍制度便显得尤为重要。本文主要围绕证明妨碍制度在知识产权诉讼中的有关法律问题进行分析,望起到抛砖引玉之功效。
Although the Code of Civil Procedure of our country has stipulated the rules of evidence, it has not yet established the system of impeding the obstruction. Although the Supreme People’s Court’s “Several Provisions on Evidence in Civil Proceedings” and the interpretation of the New Civil Procedure Law, which came into effect on February 4, 2015, make up for this shortcoming of civil law and make specific provisions for proving obstruction, Is far from enough to protect the legitimate rights and interests of the owner of intellectual property rights. When the infringer controls evidence that is unfavorable to him and beneficial to the owner of intellectual property, his refusal to perform the obligation to assist in the submission of evidence not only impedes the fair and equitable trial of intellectual property cases, but also seriously violates the principle of good faith, It may even cause tremendous waste of judicial resources and undermine the prestige of the judiciary. Therefore, it is particularly important to establish a system that impedes the system. This article focuses on proving that the system impedes the system in intellectual property litigation in the analysis of the relevant legal issues, hoping to play a valuable role.