论文部分内容阅读
目的比较一次性根充法和传统的分次根充法在治疗老年人牙髓炎的疗效,探讨治疗老年人牙髓病的方法。方法选择110例病人共计192颗符合作根管治疗术指征的患牙,随机分组,分别用一次性根充法与传统的分次根充法进行治疗,观察其疗效。结果一次性根充法和传统的分次根充法治疗效果无显著性差异。结论一次法根管治疗术可将根管预备、根管清毒和根管充填一次完成,不但缩短了疗程减少了复诊次数,还杜绝了因复诊治疗过程中根管继发感染的发生。
Objective To compare the curative effect of one-time root-filling method and traditional fractional root-filling method on the treatment of pulpitis in the elderly, and to explore the method of treating pulp disease in the elderly. Methods A total of 192 patients with 110 indications of root canal therapy were selected and randomly divided into two groups: one-time root-filling method and traditional sub-root-filling method. The curative effect was observed. Results One-time root-filling method and traditional sub-root-filling method showed no significant difference. Conclusion One root canal therapy can complete root canal preparation, root canal detoxification and root canal filling in one time, which not only shortens the duration of treatment but also reduces the number of referral times, and also eliminates the occurrence of secondary root canal infection during follow-up treatment.