论文部分内容阅读
老友祁龙威兄自扬州来电,谈及在研究清代扬州学派、整理出版扬州学派著作时,从戴东原、段若膺的书信中看到有些后人专事探讨的问题,前人早在函札中谈到了,提出函札的重要性。对此,我深有同感。记得1997年12月,我应台湾中国文哲研究所之邀,作过“函札整理”的学术报告,并将讲稿登在《中国文哲研究通讯》第八卷第二期上。今再将近代函札与“朴学”有关者,草此小文。
Old friend Xilong Wei Yang Yang from the state calls, talking about the Yangzhou school in Qing Dynasty, collation and publication of Yangzhou school writings, from Dai Dongyuan, paragraph Ruoyin letters to see some of the issues discussed by posterity, as early as before Letters in the letter talked about the importance of letter letters. I am deeply sympathetic about this. I remember in December 1997, at the invitation of Taiwan’s Institute of Chinese Literature and Philosophy, I made an academic report on Letters for Finishing Letters and put it on the second issue of the eighth volume of the Journal of Chinese Literature and Philosophy. Now again modern letter and “Pu Xue ” related, grass this small article.