论文部分内容阅读
原文:蔡君谟书,评者以为宋之鲁公①。此独其大楷则然耳,然亦不甚似也。山谷谓君谟《渴墨帖》仿佛似晋,宋间人书②,颇觇微趣③。注释:①宋之鲁公:在宋代可能比拟颜鲁公之于唐,言其既相近而且高也。②晋、宋间人:东晋和南朝宋书法以晋人为高,到宋时尚有余韵,故晋、宋间人书,必高出唐人之上者。③颇觇微趣:很能看出的微妙趣味,觇:看,观察。释义:宋人书多不善楷,唯以行楷为高。蔡襄独
Original: Cai Jun Mo books, commentators that the song of Lu public ①. This is the only common practice of the big ears, but also not quite the same. Valley that Jun-mo “Thirst ink quote” seems like Jin, Song book ②, quite a bit of fun ③. Notes: ① Song of Lugol: In the Song Dynasty may be compared to Yanlu in the Tang, saying both similar and high also. ② Jin, Song people: the Eastern Jin and Southern Song Dynasty calligraphy to high as people, to the Song Fashion aftershocks, so Jin, Song book, will be higher than the above. ③ quite ominous: it can see the subtle taste, 觇: look, observe. Interpretation: Song books are not good kaikai, only Xingkai as high. Cai Xiang alone