编辑同志:我是贵刊的一个普通读者,为了学习教育战线上不断涌现出的新经验,常常比较认真地阅读贵刊上许多佳作,近读第五期上《教法改革的探索者》一文,颇受教育,但文章里有几句话是否斟酌不够,语意不清,使人费解。例如:“……如在讲《蚕和蚂蚁》时,学生一共提出了大大小小的问题二十多个,可她只选了‘蚕劳动的结果是被开水煮抽了丝,这样写表 Editor comrades: I am an ordinary reader of your journal. In order to learn new experiences emerging from the education front, I often read many of my best works in your journal. I read the article “The Explorer of Reformation” in the fifth issue. , It is highly educated, but there are a few words in the article whether it is not enough, the meaning is unclear, it is puzzling. For example: “... When we talk about ”silkworm and ants," the students raised a total of more than 20 questions, but she only chose ‘the result of silkworm labor is to be boiled, and write the table.