目次一、“真理”的谬误:损失填补理念的反道德危机与成因二、反道德祛魅:各法域的制度突破与理论创新三、溯本根治:从侵权“损失填补单向回复”到“秩序维护双向回复”一、“真理”的谬误:损失填补理念的反道德危机与成因(一)“损失填补单向回复”理念自近代以降,损失填补原则即为侵权责任法领域不可颠覆的真理,其核心理念有二:第一,侵害权益虽可构成侵权,但仅在被侵权人有损失时,方可要求侵权人承担赔偿责任;第二,赔 First, the “truth ” fallacy: loss to fill the concept of anti-moral crisis and causes Second, the anti-moral disenchantment: the system of law breakthroughs and theoretical innovation Third, the roots of radical: from infringement “To ” order to maintain a two-way reply “A, ” Truth “fallacy: anti-moral crisis and causes of loss to fill the concept (a) ” loss to fill one-way reply "concept since modern times to reduce, That is, the truth that can not be overturned in the field of tort liability law. The core concepts are twofold: First, although the infringement of rights and interests may constitute infringement, the infringer can only be required to bear the liability for compensation only when there is a loss of the infringer. Second,