论文部分内容阅读
1803年“马伯里诉麦迪逊”一案为美国的联邦法院带来了违宪审查的春天。可200年后的中国,谁能为李慧娟法官的“违法”买单?在法律制度日益完善的今天,我们有理由相信在探寻适合中国特色社会主义法治建设的道路上,法官们有太多无的奈与尴尬。本文就李慧娟法官“越权”一案展开讨论,分析在司法尚不完善中,法官的消极审判与积极审判该如何权衡。
The case of “Marbury v. Madison” in 1803 brought unconstitutional review to the federal courts in the United States. In 200 years from now, who can pay for the “illegality” of Judge Li Huijuan? Today, with the legal system getting more and more perfect, we have reason to believe that there are too many judges on the road to exploring the construction of a socialist legal system with Chinese characteristics. Nana and embarrassed. This article discusses the case of Judge Li Huijuan and the case of “ultra vires”, and analyzes how to judge the judge’s negative trial and the positive trial in the imperfect judicature.