论文部分内容阅读
浏览作为科技人员获取信息的习用方法,与情报检索一样在文献交流中占有一席地位。然而,图书情报界对浏览与检索的关系尚存有模糊认识。分析和研究科技人员在科研不同阶段运用浏览或或检索方法收集文献信息的特点,剖析二者在文献交流中的互补关系,将有益于图书情报人员针对用户的不同需求,指导用户适时地进行抉择。一、目的方面的耦合与分野胡小元同志在《略论浏览》(下称《浏览》)中认为:“判别浏览倾向于阅读还是检索,可以看读者浏览是有目的的,还是泛泛地无目的的浏览。有目的浏览特别是长期的‘定期浏览’,一般来说目的在于检
Browsing, as a conventional method for obtaining information from scientific and technological personnel, occupies a place in the exchange of documents as information retrieval. However, there is still a vague awareness of the relationship between browsing and retrieval in the LIS community. Analysis and research of scientific and technical personnel in different stages of scientific research using browsing or or retrieval methods to collect the characteristics of the literature information, analysis of the two in the literature exchange of complementary relations, will help library and librarians to meet the different needs of users, guide users to make timely decisions . I. The Coupling and Separation of Purpose In Comrade Hu Xiaoyuan’s article “Browsing” (“Browsing”), he said: "Judging whether browsing tends to be reading or searching can see whether the purpose of reading is purposeful or not purposely Browse. Purposeful Browsing Especially for long term ’regular browsing’, the general purpose is to check