论文部分内容阅读
较之国籍和住所,作为属人连结点的经常居所地概念具有不确定性。现行法采用当事人生活中心地来界定自然人经常居所地,是用一个不确定的概念描述另一个不确定的概念,并不能显著地提升法律适用的确定性和可预见性。为减少认定属人连结点的不确定性,在给定的概念模型下,只能通过在法教义学上建构合理的解释模型,先究清作为概念核心的生活中心地这一法律观念的本意,再通过给出认定生活中心的参考事实的范围、种类、相应的规范限定和准据时间点等构成要件,协助经常居所地概念在司法实践中逐步演化出合理规则。
The concept of habitual residence as a civic link is more uncertain than nationality and domicile. The current law adopts the living center of the parties to define the habitual residence of natural persons. It uses an indefinite concept to describe another concept of uncertainty and does not significantly improve the certainty and predictability of law application. In order to reduce the uncertainty of the attachment point of a person, given the conceptual model, we can only clarify the original intention of the legal concept of life center as the core of the concept by constructing a reasonable explanation model in the legal teaching , And then by giving the reference to the fact that the center of life identified the scope of the type, the corresponding norms limit and the basis of time points and other elements to assist the concept of habitual residence in the judicial practice gradually evolved a reasonable rule.