论文部分内容阅读
目的:探讨妇产科宫颈糜烂不同治疗方案的临床效果。方法:接收2015年8月-2016年8月在我院的宫颈糜烂患者一共有108例,随机分为实验组、对照组,对照组对病人采取药物进行治疗,实验组对病人采取药物联合微波共同治疗,对比两组病人的治疗效果。结果:治疗后,实验组病人的总有效率明显高于对照组,其之间的差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:对妇产科宫颈糜烂采取药物联合微波共同治疗,可以使患者相关症状得到明显改善,进而有效促进患者预后,具有临床推广价值。
Objective: To investigate the clinical effects of different treatment options for gynecological and cervical erosion. Methods: A total of 108 cases of cervical erosion in our hospital from August 2015 to August 2016 were randomly divided into experimental group, control group and control group. Patients in the experimental group were treated with drugs and microwave Common treatment, the treatment effect of two groups of patients. Results: After treatment, the total effective rate of the experimental group was significantly higher than that of the control group, the difference was statistically significant (P <0.05). Conclusion: Gynecology and gynecology cervical erosion using drugs combined with microwave co-treatment can make the patient’s symptoms significantly improved, and thus effectively promote the prognosis of patients with clinical value.