论文部分内容阅读
在1954年10月号的科学通报上,读到了唐锡华同志对於我在同年4月号同一刊物上所报导的关於水稻的分枝问题,提出了商榷,我表示很欢迎。在这里,对於唐锡华同志所提出来的几方面的问题和看法,我想来加以讨论。首先,关於水稻和麦子在分枝形态上的不同问题,这在外形上非常明显,所以我觉得没有、也不会和麦子的分枝类型混淆起来。其次,唐锡华同志认为:“现在在这二处发现的‘分枝’水稻,是植株从根颈上面几节的叶腋间抽出的分蘖,也可以说主蘖或分蘖上再生分蘖的现象,或者就是植株分蘖节数目的增加,部
In the October 1954 Science Bulletin, Comrade Tang Xihua was read out to discuss the issue concerning the branching of rice that I reported in the same issue in the same April issue of the same year. I very much welcome that. Here I would like to discuss some of the questions and opinions put forward by Comrade Tang Xihua. First, with regard to the different morphological differences in branching between rice and wheat, this is very noticeable in shape, so I feel no or confused with the branching type of wheat. Second, Comrade Tang Xihua said: “Now, the” branched "rice found in these two places is the tiller that the plant extracts from the axillary foliage of several sections above the root of the neck. It can also be said that the main tiller or tiller reproduces the tillering phenomenon, or Increase in the number of plant tillers, Ministry