论文部分内容阅读
量刑程序的模式选择、起诉方式和答辩程序改革、量刑资料获取机制,是目前困扰量刑程序改革的三个关键问题。就量刑程序模式而言,我们应当以被告人是否认罪为标准,对被告人认罪的案件,省略定罪程序;对被告人不认罪的案件,通过庭审解决定罪以后再审理量刑问题。就配套的起诉方式和答辩程序改革而言,对于被告人认罪的案件,基本上可以沿用现有的起诉方式,但要在起诉书中增加关于量刑建议的内容;对于被告人不认罪的案件,起诉书中则不得添附仅仅与量刑有关的内容,量刑建议和量刑证据应在解决定罪问题以后单独移送。答辩程序对于量刑程序改革不可或缺,我们应当增设答辩程序。量刑资料的获取是量刑建议准确性的关键,我们应当强化侦查机关(部门)收集量刑证据的责任,并在起诉程序中加以开示,以保障量刑建议的准确性。
The selection of the sentencing procedure model, the reform of the mode of prosecution and plea bargaining, and the mechanism of obtaining sentencing information are the three key issues that have plagued the sentencing procedure reform. As far as the mode of measurement of sentencing is concerned, we should omit the procedure of conviction for the defendant’s plea of guilt on the basis of whether the defendant pleaded guilty or not; if the accused does not plead guilty, we should adjudicate the sentencing after the conviction of trial. As for the supporting reform of prosecutions and plea bargaining, the defendant’s plea of guilty pleas can basically follow the existing method of prosecution, but he should add the content of the sentencing recommendation to the indictment. For those who plead not guilty, The indictment shall not be attached only with sentencing content, sentencing recommendations and sentencing evidence should be resolved separately after the conviction issue. The defense procedure is indispensable for the reform of the sentencing procedure. We should set up a reproach procedure. The acquisition of sentencing information is the key to the accuracy of sentencing recommendations. We should reinforce the responsibility of the investigating authorities (departments) to collect evidence of sentencing and disclose it in the prosecution process so as to ensure the accuracy of the sentencing recommendations.