论文部分内容阅读
在合法替代行为的情况中,结秉的相同是以规范保护目的为标准进行的适当抽象的评价,假定合法行为发生并考察其因果关系的思维方式是合理的。存在合法替代行为的情况与行为人缺乏结果预见可能性之间没有内在的关系,通过否定行为人主观过失的以免除刑事责任的思路存在疑问;无论是基于被允许的危险还是结果回避义务的理论,均应通过否定实行行为性或事实因果关系以否定构成要件该当性。危险升高理论回避了对规范违反与结果之间因果关系的要求,与通行的结果归贵逻辑存在龃龉,且存在不当限制公民自由的危险,故本文支持唯有在合法行为下结果回避可能性近乎确定方可排除归贵的观点。
In the case of legal substitutes, the same principle applies to the proper abstraction of the standard of protection, assuming that it is reasonable to assume that the legal act takes place and the causal relationship is examined. There is no intrinsic relationship between the existence of a legal alternative and the possibility of a foreseeable absence of the actor. There is a doubt that the idea of negating criminal responsibility by negating the subjective negligence of a perpetrator; whether it is based on the permissible danger or the evasion of the result , Should be denied by the implementation of behavioral or factual causation to deny the qualifications of the constitutional elements. The theory of risk escalation avoids the requirement of causal relationship between normative violation and result, and is in conflict with the prevailing logical logic. There is danger of improperly restricting civil liberties. Therefore, this article supports the possibility of avoiding the result only under the lawful act Nearly determined to exclude Gui Gui point of view.