论文部分内容阅读
目的:观察克林霉素联合中药灌肠治疗慢性盆腔炎的临床疗效。方法:将80例慢性盆腔炎患者随机分为两组,每组40例,对照组单用克林霉素治疗,治疗组在对照组基础上给予中药灌肠治疗,观察比较两组临床疗效及对炎症因子的影响。结果:TNF-α、IL-1β两组治疗前后组内比较及治疗后组间比较,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);总有效率治疗组为97.5%,对照组为87.5%,组间比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);复发率治疗组为5.1%,对照组为25.7%,组间比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:克林霉素联合中药灌肠治疗慢性盆腔炎优于单用克林霉素治疗。
Objective: To observe the clinical efficacy of clindamycin combined with traditional Chinese medicine enema in the treatment of chronic pelvic inflammatory disease. Methods: Eighty patients with chronic pelvic inflammatory disease were randomly divided into two groups (n = 40 in each group). The control group was treated with clindamycin only. The treatment group was given enema on the basis of the control group. The clinical efficacy and Inflammatory factors. Results: The levels of TNF-α and IL-1β in the two groups before and after treatment were significantly higher than those in the control group (P <0.05). The total effective rate was 97.5% in the treatment group and 87.5% in the control group, The difference between the two groups was statistically significant (P <0.05). The recurrence rate was 5.1% in the treatment group and 25.7% in the control group. There was significant difference between the two groups (P <0.05). Conclusion: Clindamycin combined with traditional Chinese medicine enema treatment of chronic pelvic inflammatory disease better than single clindamycin treatment.