“一人一票”听起来简单易行,推行起来却困难重重,因为其中涉及到很多复杂的议题,例如投票人的住址证明与公民身份的确定等等。“一人一票”是否代表每票具有相同的影响力?为何我们听过美国总统得不到大部分市民支持仍能当选?请看文章。A Complicated Task复杂的问题“一人一票,且每票影响力相等”此举,并不是一件如我想象中简单的事。在美国,投票本来不是基本的权利,奴隶在美国南北战争后才可投票;女性在1919年方获得投 “One person, one vote” sounds simple and easy to implement, because it involves many complicated issues such as the confirmation of the address of the voter and the determination of citizenship. Does “one person, one vote” represent the same influence on each vote? Why do we hear that the president of the United States can still be elected without the support of the majority of the public? A Complicated Task Complex Problem “One person, one vote, and each vote has equal influence.” This move is not a simple one as I imagined it. Voting in the United States was not a fundamental right, slaves could vote after the American Civil War; women were cast in 1919