随着“中国包装装潢第一案”的一审结果新鲜出炉,学界对商标许可使用后增值利益的归属问题的讨论愈发热烈,然而,由于《商标法》对此并没有规定。对于该问题,我们应该依照民法的“意思自治”原则,首先可以允许双方当事人在许可使用合同中约定,如果没有约定,则按照“公平原则”对增值利益部分进行公平的划分。 With the first trial results of “China ’s packaging and decorating ” freshly baked, the academic circles have become more and more heated discussions on the ownership of value-added profits after the use of trademarks. However, there is no stipulation in the Trademark Law. For this issue, we should accord the principle of “autonomy of means” of the civil law first to allow the two parties to agree in the license agreement. If there is no agreement, the part of value added benefit should be divided fairly according to “fairness principle ”.