论文部分内容阅读
“女性话语”是女性主体意识的反映,重建女性话语意味着打破男权文化传统和语言秩序的束缚,恢复女性的想象自由,把女性对生活的体验写进历史。埃莱娜.西苏倡导的“女性书写”和莫尼克.威蒂格实践的“女同性恋书写”都建立在反思身体和语言的基础上,但两者之间的差别却是不容忽视的。如果说女性相对于男性的差异是驱动“女性书写”这种特殊语言的马达,那么威蒂格的“女同性恋书写”则通过拒斥“女人”这一概念,反对强调性别差异和女性本质。本文对这两种书写模式进行对比研究,并探讨它们颠覆现有秩序、改变未来潜力以及不可避免的局限。
Female discourse is a reflection of the female consciousness, and reconstruction of female discourse means breaking the shackles of the patriarchal culture tradition and the language order, restoring women ’s freedom of imagination and writing women’ s experience of life into history. Elena Sissou’s advocacy of Women’s Writing and Monique Weitig’s practice of lesbian writing are based on the reflection of body and language but the difference between the two is Can not be ignored. If we say that the difference between women and men drives motors in special languages such as “women’s writing,” Wittig’s “lesbian writing” rejects the notion of “woman” and opposes the emphasis Gender differences and the nature of women. This article compares these two modes of writing and explores their potential to subvert the existing order, change its future potential, and its inevitable limitations.