论文部分内容阅读
我县在实行“有偿立卷”收费的问题上,采用了两种不同的标准:即直接立卷(由档案部门一手包揽立卷),每卷收费一元;间接立卷(档案部门只负责案卷的质量),每卷收费伍角。近两年,我们先后在县直三个机关单位搞有偿立卷共收费一千余元。结合本县的实际,笔者认为“有偿立卷”弊大于利,不仅创不了收,反而还会影响档案事业的发展,实不可取。主要原因有以下几点:
My county in the implementation of the “paid legislation” on the issue of fees, the use of two different standards: that is, the direct reference to the volume (by the archival sector single-handedly take the initiative), each volume charges $ 1; indirect file (the file department is only responsible for file The quality), each volume fee Wu angle. In the recent two years, we successively paid a total of more than a thousand yuan for the three-part government agencies in the county. Combined with the actual county, I believe that “paid legislation” more harm than good, not only failed to close, but will also affect the development of the file business, it is not desirable. The main reasons are the following: