论文部分内容阅读
目的 :评价不同分娩方式住院费用。方法 :利用医院病案首页统计数据库中相关资料 ,对 1999年 1月至 9月某医院分娩的单胎妊娠产妇按分娩方式分为正常阴道分娩、阴道分娩伴产后异常、阴道助产、剖宫产 ,采用ANOVA方法比较分娩住院费用、住院天数。结果 :2 5 6 5名单胎妊娠的产妇剖宫产率 46 .8% ,剖宫产分娩平均住院费用、平均住院天数及日平均住院费用均高于三个阴道分娩组 ,差异有显著性 (p <0 .0 0 1)。结论 :随着对医疗改革及医疗费用的关注 ,降低剖宫产率能节省医疗资源 ,减少医疗费用。
Purpose: To evaluate hospitalization costs for different modes of delivery. Methods: According to the relevant data in the hospital’s medical record database, the single-pregnancy mothers delivered from January 1999 to September 1999 were divided into normal vaginal delivery, vaginal delivery, postpartum abnormalities, vaginal delivery, and cesarean delivery. The ANOVA method was used to compare the costs of hospitalization and hospitalization days. RESULTS: The cesarean section rate was 46.8% for 2569 women with fetal gestational age. The average hospitalization cost, average length of hospital stay, and daily hospitalization cost for cesarean delivery were higher than those of the three vaginal delivery groups. The difference was significant ( p<0.0 0 1). Conclusion: With the focus on medical reforms and medical costs, reducing the rate of cesarean section can save medical resources and reduce medical costs.