滇池北部福保湾主要承接上游昆明市的生活污水及周边工业污水,其污染程度极为严重.本研究在福保湖湾内设置4个采样点,分别采集了不同区域的沉积物,首次模拟研究了微囊藻(Microcystis)在不同沉积物环境中复苏能力差异,结果表明微囊藻在模拟实验中的复苏能力表现出对不同底质的不同适应性,入口湖区的沉积物对微囊藻的复苏有极强的抑制作用.藻类复苏后达到的最大生物量(以叶绿素a计)分别为东岸对照区的4.7%,西岸对照区的6.6%及吹填区的11.9%,其中微囊藻生物量也远低于其它各样点,占东岸对照、吹填区及西岸对照的比例分别为5.2%、10.3%和19.4%.以上研究暗示了河口处沉积物不适合微囊藻的复苏.福保湾藻类水华的种源贡献应该主要依靠外源性输入,即湖流场和风向所导致的藻类水平迁移贡献远远大于底泥复苏至水体的垂直迁移.“,”Fubao Bay is located in the north of Lake Dianchi, which is one of the most seriously polluted bays in the lake. Two main rivers, Haihe River and Daqinghe River flow into Fubao Bay from the north. Four sampling sites were settled in this bay, and the sediment samples were collected by using Petersen grab. For the first time, the study of recruitment ability of Mierocystis in different sediment environments was carded out in simulation devices. The results in the present study showed that the recruitment ability of Microcystis was quite different depended on its habitat environments. The Microcystis recovery was inhibited in lacustrine sediments near estuary, and the maximum biomass (calculated as chlorophyll-a) was pretty lower than other sampling sites. Compared among East Coast Area, West Coast Area and Hydraulic Mud Fill Area, the Microcystis biomass were only 4.7%, 6.6% and 11.9%, respectively. And Microeystis biomass (calculated as Microcystis cell numbers) were about 5.2%, 10.3% and 19.4%, corresponding. All the results indicated that sediments in estuary of Fubao Bay were not appropriate for Microcystis recruitment. The contribution of “seeds bank” recruiting to form HABs in this bay could be much less than the wind-induced external loading. All these results could be helpful in Microcystis blooms forecasting, preventing and controlling in the future.