论文部分内容阅读
自上世纪90年代以来,由美国国内关于是否接受“乌拉圭回合一揽子协议”所导致的“1994年主权大辩论”为开端,对于“主权”在当代国际经贸政策规范的制定、实施过程中所起作用这一关键问题,美国著名国际经济法学家约翰·杰克逊教授逐渐形成、并撰文发表了系列观点,其思维进路即称为Sovereignty-Modern(“当代主权观”)。杰克逊力图将主权问题异化为权力分配的问题,并倡议以实用主义的导向将此见解吸收到国家的政策决策进程中。对于这种主权观,因其内在的论证逻辑缺陷和法律价值缺失,尤其应予审慎剖析和辩证评价。
Since the 90s of the last century, the “domestic debate on the sovereignty of 1994” led by the “Uruguay Round Package Agreement” has been the starting point for the U.S. domestic acceptance of the “norms of sovereignty” in the formulation of contemporary international trade and economic policy norms , The key issue that played a role in the process of implementation. Professor John Jackson, a famous American international economic jurist, was gradually formed and his series of articles were published. The way of thinking is called Sovereignty-Modern (“Contemporary Sovereignty” ). Jackson sought to alienate the issue of sovereignty into the issue of the distribution of power and advocated that this view should be absorbed into the policy-making process of the country with pragmatism. For this kind of sovereignty, due to its inherent logic defects of logic and lack of legal value, in particular, it should be carefully analyzed and dialectically evaluated.