司法裁判是解释法律、适用法律的理性过程,但是,理性的发达并不必然意味着公正目标的实现。受外部条件的制约,法官的理性判断必然会掺杂进各种主观的成分,致使法官偏离了法律原则、法律规范和先例,形成一种个性化的“偏见”。人生阅历和社会的、司法的各种经验隐蔽在法官的知识 Judicial judgment is a rational process of explaining law and applying law. However, the development of rationality does not necessarily mean the realization of an impartial goal. Constrained by external conditions, the judge's judgments will inevitably be mixed into a variety of subjective elements, leaving the judge deviated from the legal principles, legal norms and precedents to form a personalized “prejudice.” Life experience and social, judicial experience hidden in the judge's knowledge