论文部分内容阅读
关于《庄子·内篇》的归属,历来都肯定它为庄子本人所作,以之为研究庄子思想的主要依据。六十年代初,任继愈同志发表《庄子探源》(见《中国哲学史论》)提出了新的见解,认为内篇为“后期庄学”思想,而外、杂篇中之若干篇倒是反映了庄子本人思想。今天,它不仅成为任继愈同志关于先秦哲学思想体系研究的一个重要环节,也成为学术界庄学研究的一种有影响的见解。本文试就《庄子探源》(以下简称《探源》)的这一观点谈谈不同看法,以申述传统观点之所以然。
As for the affiliation of “Chuang Tzu”, it has always been affirmed that Zhuang Tzu himself did it as the main basis for the study of Chuang Tzu’s thought. In the early 1960s, Comrade Ren Jiyu published a new source of insight into Chuang-tzu (see the History of Chinese Philosophy) and put forward a new opinion that the inner part is the thought of “late Zhuang-xue” and that some articles in the outer and miscellaneous articles reflect Zhuangzi own thought. Today, it not only becomes an important part of Comrade Ren Jiyu’s study on the philosophical system of pre-Qin philosophy, but also becomes an influential one in the study of Zhuang studies in academia. This paper attempts to talk about different views on this view of “Chuang Tzu” (hereinafter referred to as “the source”), in order to claim the reason of the traditional viewpoints.