论文部分内容阅读
侵权行为的构成要件有三要件说与四要件说之争。三要件说认为一般侵权行为的构成要件包括过错、损害结果以及过错与损害结果的因果关系;而四要件说则认为除上述三者外,一般侵权行为的构成要件还包括行为的违法性。作者认为,违法性要件之所以产生,是因为德国民法典将侵权行为的范围严格限制在侵犯法律规定的权利的范围内。但是后来的发展证明这种对侵权行为的限定性列举严重限制了侵权行为法的发展。从国际侵权法的立法趋势、过错与违法性要件逐渐合二为一的事实等要求我们采用三要件说。
Constitutive elements of tort have three elements that the dispute with the four elements that. The three elements said that the constitutional elements of the general tort include the fault, the result of the damage, and the causal relationship between the fault and the result of the damage. The four elements said that in addition to the above three elements, the constitutional elements of the general tort also include the illegality of the act. The author believes that the reason for the illegality arises because the German civil code strictly limits the extent of the infringement to infringe upon the rights prescribed by the law. However, subsequent developments demonstrated that such a restrictive enumeration of violations severely limits the development of tort law. From the legislative tendency of international tort law, the fact that fault and illegality elements are gradually combined into one requires that we adopt the three elements to say.