论文部分内容阅读
在联系产权制度分析国家目标时,诺斯悖论显示:由于国家双重目标的内在矛盾,国家的租金最大化和通过社会产出最大化从而国家税收最大化,两者不可兼得。笔者认为,诺斯悖论缘于资本主义私有制的国家性质,社会主义国家具备克服“诺思悖论”的制度基础和现实可能。社会主义国家可以有效利用市场的微观调节和政府的宏观调控两种决定作用,以制度和能力的构建主动解除交易费用约束和竞争约束,从而消除“诺思悖论”。在转型时期,我国存在两种“诺思悖论”现象,这两种“诺斯悖论”引起学界对待政府与市场的决定作用的不同倾向。笔者认为第二种形似“诺斯悖论”现象源于扩大市场作用的同时没有正确发挥政府作用,因此要准确处理政府与市场两种作用的关系,各司其职,从而消解“诺斯悖论”现象。
When analyzing the national objectives in connection with the property rights system, the North paradox shows that the two can not have both because of the internal contradictions of the dual objectives of the state, the maximization of state rent and the maximization of state revenue through the maximization of social output. In my opinion, the North paradox is due to the nature of the capitalist private ownership and the socialist countries have the institutional foundation and realistic possibility of overcoming the “North paradox.” Socialist countries can make effective use of the market’s micro-regulation and the government’s macro regulation and control, and take the initiative to lift the transaction cost constraints and competition constraints so as to eliminate the “North Paradox.” In the transitional period, there are two phenomena of “North Paradox” in our country, and these two “North Paradoxes” have caused different tendencies of scholars in treating the decisive role of the government and the market. The author believes that the second kind of phenomenon “North Paradox ” originated from the role of expanding the market but did not play a correct role as a government. Therefore, we should accurately handle the relationship between the two roles of the government and the market, North paradox "phenomenon.