论文部分内容阅读
“假设—反问”型有标复句是指后应句用反问的方式对前呼型假设句做出某种判断的句子。本文拟从语境视角考察四类较为典型的“假设—反问”型有标复句——证伪式、强致使式、强条件式、劝谏式“假设—反问”型有标复句的语用意旨所在。之所以从语境视角切入,是因为要想知道某个句子属于哪一类型的“假设—反问”型有标复句,往往要结合具体的语境才有可能做出准确的判断。更重要的是,这四类较典型的“假设—反问”型有标复句在语用推理、意旨表达以及语用焦点方面的异同,照样需要依靠特定语境才能准确鉴别。
“Hypothetical - Inverse ” type A punctual sentence refers to the sentence after the sentence should be used to make a certain judgment on the pre-citation hypothetical sentence after the sentence. This paper attempts to examine four types of typical “hypothetical-antonym” dichotomous sentences from the perspective of context: falsification type, strong result type, strong conditional type, persuasion type, “hypothetical-questioning type” The pragmatic meaning of complex sentences lies. The reason why it is cut from the perspective of context is that it is often possible to make accurate judgments based on specific contexts in order to know which type of “hypothetical-antonym” type sentence a certain sentence belongs to. More importantly, the similarities and differences between these four types of typical “hypothetical-antonym” concurrative sentences in terms of pragmatic reasoning, meaning expression and pragmatic focus still need to rely on certain contexts to accurately identify them.