论文部分内容阅读
本文采用建构主义理论框架和包含多重现实之仪式性传播模式分析了《纽约时报》、《华盛顿邮报》和《洛杉矶时报》从 1 999年到 2 0 0 1年关于李文和案的报道 ,发现三份报章之间 ,甚至同一报章在案件发展的不同时期 ,都有明显差异。这些差异表明 ,美国主流媒体在报道该案过程中不仅对华裔的刻板印象进行了定型化处理 ,而且也存在争辩。不同的采编风格和处理手段反映出各新闻机构出于政治文化及报业竞争的需要而在选择客观真实、处理法理真实的基础上建构媒介真实 ,形成了李文和案报道过程中的多重现实景观 ,同时为我们深入了解美国媒介市场的内在运行机制提供了一次难得的契机。
This article analyzes the reports of Li Wenhe from 1999 to 2001 by The New York Times, The Washington Post and The Los Angeles Times using the constructivism framework and the ritualistic transmission mode with multiple realities. It is found that there are obvious differences between the three newspapers and even the same newspaper at different stages of the development of the case. These differences show that the mainstream media in the United States not only made stereotypes about the stereotypes of Chinese Americans during the coverage of the case, but also argued. Different editorial styles and handling methods reflect the fact that news agencies need to create an objective reality and handle the truth of jurisprudence based on the needs of political culture and newspaper competition, and thus form the multiple reality in reporting the case of Li Wenhe The landscape at the same time provides a rare opportunity for us to gain an in-depth understanding of the inner operation mechanism of the U.S. media market.