论文部分内容阅读
二战以来,世界范围内的司法改革出现了两个明显特征:一是越来越多的替代性纠纷解决办法;一是法院或法官诉讼指挥权的加强。文章以此两种世界潮流为背景对我国的司法改革作了比较性的思考。文章认为,中国在法律“现代化”的过程中,注重加强国家法院体系的作用和张扬公民权利的同时,也要适当维持、完善乃至发展一些替代性纠纷解决办法;适当引进对抗制的同时,也不能完全忽视法官积极主动的作用。
Since World War II, there have been two distinct characteristics of judicial reform in the world: one is more and more alternative dispute resolution methods; the other is the strengthening of the command power of court or judicial proceedings. Based on these two world trends, the article makes a comparative study of the judicial reform in our country. The article argues that while focusing on strengthening the role of national court system and publicizing the rights of citizens during the “modernization” of law, China should also appropriately maintain, improve and even develop some alternative dispute resolution measures. At the same time as appropriate, the introduction of adversarial system The judge’s active role can not be completely ignored.