论文部分内容阅读
由于实践概念的复杂性和多义性,实践哲学存在着不同的思想传统。本文提出,哲学史有两种实践哲学传统,即道德实践论和技术实践论。这就是西方实践哲学中的“praxis”和“practice”之争的由来。它导致实践哲学的分裂,也导致理性自身的分裂,导致人类完整的实践活动分裂和片面化。马克思主义实践哲学必须超越对人类行为的片面的理解,从实践意识、实践行为和人的存在上完整地理解人类实践活动。马克思主义实践哲学本质上是人类学实践哲学。在人类学实践哲学的基础上,我们才能正确地理解理论和实践的关系,正确理解马克思主义实践哲学对传统实践哲学的超越。人类学实践哲学是一种新的哲学范式。
Due to the complexity and polysemy of practice concepts, there are different traditions in practical philosophy. This paper argues that there are two kinds of philosophical history of the traditional philosophy of practice, that is, the theory of moral practice and technical practice. This is the origin of the dispute between “praxis” and “practice” in western practical philosophy. It leads to the division of practical philosophy and the division of reason itself, leading to the division and unilateralization of the complete practice of humankind. Marxist practical philosophy must transcend one-sided understanding of human behavior and fully understand human practices from the perspective of practice, practice and human existence. Marxist practical philosophy is essentially an anthropological practical philosophy. On the basis of anthropological practical philosophy, we can correctly understand the relationship between theory and practice and correctly understand the transcendence of Marxist practical philosophy to the traditional philosophy of practice. Anthropological practice philosophy is a new philosophical paradigm.