论文部分内容阅读
1.评注的结构与内容a)评注工作应当围绕所评注法条之内容与结构展开。具体规范的评注既需达到一定的理论深度,又需内容紧凑。评注应当严谨、简洁、易于理解,不能采取专著或教科书式的介绍。法典评注书以措辞简明与语言清晰著称。评注表达的学术观点原则上应当汇集为明确的判断,避免没有具体判断建议的问题讨论。总之,评注应当以有限的篇幅为学术和实践提供尽可能多且清晰的解决方案。
1. The structure and content of the commentary a) The commentary should focus on the content and structure of the commentary. Specific norms commentary needs to reach a certain theoretical depth, but also the content is compact. Commentary should be rigorous, concise, easy to understand, can not take monographs or textbook-style presentation. The Codex Commentary is best known for its conciseness and clarity of language. The academic views expressed in the commentary should, in principle, be pooled as clear judgments to avoid discussion of issues without specific judgment. In summary, the commentary should provide as much and clear solutions to academic and practical issues in limited space.