论文部分内容阅读
新《公司法》一如修订前的版本,仍然在法人与企业交集的背景下,限定自己规定的对象而没有囊括所有的公司类型;仍然继续坚持以是否将资本划分为等额股份作为区分自己规定的公司的重要标准;仍然维持了以往法律法规中看重企业出身,重法人轻个人,以及内外有别的差序格局。对“公司”、“股份”和“职工”等词的辨析表明,许多问题不能指望通过一部法律的一次修改而得到彻底解决。公司法只是公司历史的一个总结,一个需要根据当下情形不断修正的总结。
The new Corporations Act, like the pre-revision version, still limited its own definition of targets to all corporate types in the context of the convergence of corporations and enterprises. It continued to adhere to the principle of dividing capital into equal shares as a differentiator Of the company’s important criteria; still maintain the laws and regulations in the previous emphasis on business origin, heavy legal personality, as well as the difference between inside and outside the pattern of difference. The disambiguation of the words “company”, “share” and “worker” shows that many problems can not be expected to be completely solved by a single law amendment. Corporate law is only a summary of the company’s history, a need to constantly revised according to the current situation summary.