对科研项目进行合理排序,是科研项目评审和筛选的前提,也是科研管理的重要内容。被评科研项目数量有限情形下采用专家排序方式更为合理,而有序投票模型是处理此类问题的经典方法。提出了基于公共权重的有序投票模型,给出了基于交叉评价与总体评价的公共权重确定方法,弥补了传统有序投票模型中权重不一致、区分度不高的缺陷。 The reasonable ordering of scientific research projects is the precondition of scientific research project review and screening, and also an important content of scientific research management. It is more reasonable to use the expert sorting method when the number of scientific research projects is limited, and the orderly voting model is the classic method to deal with such problems. This paper proposes an orderly voting model based on public weights, and gives a method for determining public weights based on cross-evaluation and overall evaluation, which makes up for the shortcomings of inconsistent weight and low degree of distinction in the traditional sequential voting model.