古今中外,对证据存在着各式各样的理解,诸如“原因说”、“结果说”、“方法学”、“事实说”、“证明说”、“反映说”、“信息说”、“综合说”、“两义说”、“多义说”、“统一说”等。本文的目的不在于穷尽一切观点,亦不在于自以为是地提出自己的某种结论,我们的本意在于这样一种反思:我们太习惯于凡事都寻求一个统一的标准,而没有用一个多元、开放、兼容并包的胸襟去理解每一个不同的声音。对于此一点,田成有先生在阐述法律在他眼里是个什么样的事物时论述得可谓精辟:“这 At all times and in all countries, there is a wide range of understanding of evidence, such as ”cause “, ”result “, ”methodology “, ”fact “, ” “Reflect ”, “Message said ”, “Comprehensive said ”, “Two meanings ”, “Polysemy said ”, “Unity said ” and so on. The purpose of this paper is not to exhaust all opinions nor to put forward some conclusions of our own accord. Our intention is to reflect on such a reflection that we are so accustomed to seeking a uniform standard in everything but not a pluralistic, open, Compatible with the package mind to understand each different voice. In this regard, Mr. Tian Chengyou described the law in his eyes is what kind of thing can be described as incisive: "This