论文部分内容阅读
故宫博物院藏《春山图》卷一直被归于北宋燕肃名下,但自入藏以来,就其是否确为北宋真迹,始终存在争议。基于此,本文在学界对作品已有的研究基础上,重新梳理《春山图》的流传经过,并对卷后题跋内容及作者归属、鉴藏印位置及真伪以及图像所呈现的时代风格依次予以考察辨析,尝试从多个角度探讨《春山图》中存在的疑点及所暴露的破绽,以此推断《春山图》并非北宋燕肃真迹。最后,作者将此图与《右军书扇图》相联系,通过对验二图类似的伪题、伪印,探究今日所见《春山图》的形成时间和制作缘由。
Palace Museum of the possession of “Spring Mountain” volume has been attributed to the Northern Song Dynasty name, but since its inception, whether it is indeed the authentic Northern Song Dynasty, there is always controversial. Based on this, on the basis of the existing studies of the works in the academic field, this article re-sorts the spread of the Spring Mountain Map, and analyzes the content of the postscript and the ownership of the author, the location and authenticity of the jianzangcun, and the style of the times presented by the images To investigate and analyze, try to explore from many angles, “Spring Mountain” in the doubt and the exposed flaws, inferred that “Spring Mountain” is not authentic Northern Song Dynasty. Finally, the author links this figure with the book “Right-wing Book Fan” and explores the formation time and the reason for the creation of “Spring Hill Map” as seen today by examining a similar pseudo-title and counterfeit map.