《中学历史教学参考》2012年第7期发表了新疆石河子第一中学赵旭国老师《历史教学要谨防概念化解释一从“男耕女织”模式下纺织业的地位说起》(以下简称赵文)一文,阐述了“‘副业’作为一个现代才有的概念,不能用来定位中国古代‘男耕女织’模式下纺织业的历史地位”这一观点。该文刊出以后,江苏省泗阳中学章小景、陈太喜二位老师发表《也谈“男耕女织”模式下纺织业的地位》(以下简称章、陈文)一文,对赵文的观点与论证过程提出了质疑。同时也提出了自己的 “High School History Teaching Reference” 2012 the seventh issue of Xinjiang Shihezi First High School Zhao Xuguo teacher “history teaching should beware of the conceptualization of interpretation from” male plow women “mode” status of the textile industry “(hereinafter referred to as Zhao This paper elaborates the view that ”sideline ’as ​​a modern concept can not be used to locate the historical position of the textile industry under the model of“ male plowwoman ”in ancient China. After the article was published, Zhang Xiaofeng and Chen Taixi, two teachers from Siyang Middle School in Jiangsu Province, published a speech entitled “Talk about the status of the textile industry under the model of male plow women” (hereinafter referred to as Zhang and Chen Wen) Opinion and argumentation process raised the question. Also made their own