当前,解决农民负担过重的问题已引起了人们的重视。仁者见仁,智者见智,论述之丰,方法之多,为减轻农民负担开阔了视野,拓宽了路子。最近笔者在接触到的一些文章论述、文件规定和会议发言中,相当多的提到靠发展集体经济,办村组企业,为农民负担“分流”,以减轻负担;有的文件中甚至写上“办好村组企业是减轻农民负担的主要途径”;有的则提到“开源节流”,解决负担过重的问题。无庸置言,这些都是可行之法。但相比之下,从“减”字上做文章的却很不集中,显得单薄,这使我产生了几点感想: At present, the issue of overloading peasants has attracted people’s attention. The benevolent sees the benevolent, the wise seeks the wisdom, discusses abundance and methods, broadens the horizons and broadens the path for alleviating the peasant’s burden. Recently, some article articles, documents, and speeches made by the author pointed out quite a lot about relying on the development of a collective economy and running village-owned enterprises to shoulder the burden of “diversion” for peasants so as to ease the burden. Some documents even wrote “Well-run village-group enterprises are the main ways to reduce the burden on peasants”; while others refer to “increasing revenue and reducing expenditure” to solve the problem of over-burdening. Needless to say, these are all feasible ways. However, in contrast, from the “minus” word on the article is very concentrated, appear thin, which made me feel a few thoughts: