最近看到这样一个消息,加拿大最高法院裁定,父母不须因为轻微体罚子女而被刑事起诉。了解国外法律的人都知道,在国外,孩子虽然是自己亲生养育的,但也不能任意打骂。如果有悖于规定,孩子自己或者周围的旁观者报案,警察会毫不客气的把家长送上法庭,法庭也会不留情面的进行刑事犯罪方面的判决。所以国外的孩子享有充分的自由,从一出生落地,法律就开始对其保护。这种保护甚至包括对其父母的制约。我们常常在影视中看到,孩子跟父母产生了矛盾,父母想以拳脚来征服孩子,会引来许多麻烦的。因为危机关头,孩子会拿出杀手锏:报警!在法律和义务面前,如果让家长选择,大多数的家长们会毫不犹豫地选择前者。法律是无情的,而义务是有情的,只不过这种情有时会被一时的冲动所代替。事后许多家长会为自己的莽撞而后悔,更多的则为自己明智的选择而庆幸。现在加拿大从法律上推翻了以往的传统做法,给了父母以体罚子女的权利。这个消息不仅在加拿大本国,就连周边的美国等国家也引起了不小的反响。加拿大要家长对孩子打开“杀戒”?答案当然是否定的。在人权高于一切的发达国家,法官们再糊涂也不会犯如此低级的错误。加拿大大法官们只是尊重现实,做出了符合实际的判决。这种看似是对家长的宽容,不仅对孩子毫无伤害,相反更加维护了孩子的尊严。首先法律把家长体罚用限制词做 Recently saw such a news, the Supreme Court of Canada ruled that parents need not be prosecuted for the crime of minor corporal punishment. Anyone who understands foreign laws knows that while abroad, children are nourished by themselves but can not be arbitrarily beaten. If contrary to the provisions of the child or bystanders around themselves to report the case, the police will bluntly put the parents to court, the court will be merciless criminal judgments. Therefore, foreign children enjoy full freedom, from birth to birth, the law began to protect them. This protection even includes the restrictions on their parents. We often see in film and television that children have conflicts with their parents. Parents who want to conquer their children with fists and feet can cause many troubles. Because of the crisis, the child will come up with a killer: alarm! In front of the law and obligation, if parents choose, most parents will not hesitate to choose the former. The law is ruthless, and the obligation is affectionate, except that it is sometimes replaced by impulse. Many parents later regret for their own recklessness, but more fortunate for their wise choice. Canada now legally overthrows the traditional practice of giving parents the right to corporal punishment of their children. The news not only in Canada’s own country, even the surrounding countries such as the United States has also caused no small reaction. Canada parents want to open their children “kill” The answer is of course no. In developed countries where all human rights are above all else, judges are not allowed to make such mistakes. The Canadian judges just respected the reality and made a realistic verdict. This seemingly is for the parents of tolerance, not only harmless to children, on the contrary more to maintain the child’s dignity. First of all, the law punishes parents with corporal punishment