法院与菲律宾民主的瓦解和重建：———得自最高法院议程的证据Ｃ·尼尔·泰特尽管在民主的各种定义中无不提到法院和法官潜在的重要作用，但要了解法院和法官在民主化进程中的作用，仍有许多理论和实际工作尚待完成。不过，在为数不多的理论成果中，对于法院在民主的瓦解和重建过程中如何开展工作，仍提出了某些论断。本文试图通过菲律宾最高法院的情况对这些论断加以检验。选择菲律宾来考察法院在民主化进程中的作用是恰当的。在民主制瓦解之前，菲律宾最高法院以其独立性和不偏不倚赢得了令全世界任何法院都羡慕的声誉；而到１９８６年马科斯独裁政权行将结束时，人们却认为它在判决时唯命是从，偏袒，狭隘，胆小怕事。本文利用菲律宾最高法院议程的一些模式对有关的理论进行了分析。〔黄语生译 Disintegration and Reconstruction of the Courts and the Philippines Democrats: Evidence Derived from the Supreme Court C Neil Tyster Despite the potentially significant role of courts and judges in the various definitions of democracy, it is important to understand that courts and Judges in the process of democratization, there are still many theoretical and practical work yet to be completed. However, among the few theoretical achievements, some assertions are still made about how the courts work in the process of demolition and reconstruction of democracy. This article attempts to test these assertions through the case of the Supreme Court of the Philippines. It is appropriate to choose the Philippines to examine the role of the courts in democratization. Prior to the demise of democracy, the Philippine Supreme Court, with its independence and impartiality, won the reputation of being admired by any court in the world; and by the end of Marcos’s dictatorship in 1986, it was believed that it was the only one in the judgment Is from, favoritism, narrow, timid. This article uses some models of the Philippine Supreme Court agenda to analyze the theory. [Yellow language students translation