论文部分内容阅读
首都某报2004年7月22日载文《科学靠证伪而不是反伪向前发展》批评我国科学界“反伪”之风是一种很不正常的情况,认为“科学从来就是靠证伪向前发展的,从来没靠‘反伪’向前发展过。”此文把“反伪”与“证伪”对立起来,说“‘反伪’不可能推动科学向前发展,甚至还可能阻碍科学的发展”,是完全错误的。事实上,“证伪”本身就是一种反对某项伪科学的行动,最后达到的效果也是反对某项伪科学。辩证地说,证伪以反伪为目的,才有了动力与方向;反伪以证伪为依据,才
The Capital Newspaper, July 22, 2004 The article, “Science Relying on False as False as Counterfeit, Moving Forward” Criticizes the “anti-counterfeiting” style of the Chinese scientific community as a very unusual situation and holds that “science has always been evidence-based Pseudo-forward development, never rely on ’anti-pseudo’ forward. ”This article“ anti-counterfeiting ”and“ fake ”against each other, saying that“ ’anti-counterfeiting’ can not promote the development of science and even May hinder the development of science ”is completely wrong. In fact, “falsification” is itself an act of opposition to a pseudo-science, and the final result is to oppose a pseudo-science. Dialectically, fake counterfeiting for the purpose, only the motivation and direction; anti-pseudo-fake as the basis, only