论文部分内容阅读
本文是对我刊2016年第1期《指暇》一文的商榷,分两大部分,有理有据有节,与黄伟同志展开时空对话。这种百家争鸣的学术精神,是我刊所一直提倡并引导的。一套试卷也好,一篇文章也好,一本教材也好,不可能白璧无瑕。发现问题、提出问题、探讨问题、解决问题,是我们不断改进教育教学和试题命制的动力。文章既有基于课程教育价值的理性学术思考,又有基于国情地情生情的感性情怀担当,读来如沐春风,没有矫揉造作之感,没有找茬针对之嫌。诚如本文所说:作为思想交流与观点碰撞,对同仁研究思想品德试题命制和弘扬求真务实学术风气确是一件有益之事。
This article is a discussion of my article entitled “Zhi Shi” in the first issue of 2016. There are two parts in this article. The academic spirit of this hundred schools of thought is what I always advocate and guide. A set of papers Ye Hao, an article Ye Hao, a textbook Ye Hao, can not be perfect. Identifying problems, asking questions, discussing problems and solving problems are the motivation for us to continuously improve the teaching and examination system of exam questions. The article not only has the rational academic thinking based on the value of curriculum education, but also has the emotional feelings based on the situation of the country and the world. It reads like a breeze and has no sense of artificiality and no suspicion. As we have said in this article, as a collision of ideas and ideas, it is beneficial for our colleagues to study the life-style of the ideological and moral questions and to promote the realistic and pragmatic academic atmosphere.