论文部分内容阅读
《论语·阳货》子曰:「唯女子与小人为难养也,近之则不孙,远之则怨。」一直以来,近代学者亟思从各方角度给与新的诠释,无论是运用文字学、声韵学、训诂学,或社会中重男轻女的思想观……等,均可以说出一套自圆其说的理由来,因每个汉字都有多种不同的涵义,任意发挥,可能造成原意曲解与过于主观的通病。在研读分析过后,仍认为应以《论语》经典溯源的方式来解释较为公允、客观。
The Analects of Confucius says: “The only woman and the villain are difficult to raise, and the ones that are not grandchildren are far behind and the ones that are far away.” Modern scholars have been pressing for new interpretations from all angles, Using philology, phonology, exegetics, or patriarchal attitudes in society, etc., we can all say a set of reasons to justify ourselves. Because each Chinese character has many different meanings, it can be played arbitrarily, possibly Cause the original intention misinterpretation and too subjective common problems. After studying and analyzing, I still think it is more fair and objective to explain it in the classical trace of “Analects”.