独立性和一裁终局性体现了仲裁制度的基本精神,仲裁裁决由于其准司法特点,也必然受制于国家司法权力的监督和制约。我国《仲裁法》所建构的对国内仲裁进行实体性和程序性全面司法监督的体制,在现实中存在监督不当的可能,更重要的是与仲裁制度本质以及与民事诉讼机制平衡关系等存在抵触。从制度构建的角度来讲,应改而确立司法对仲裁的程序性监督机制,保证司法机制和仲裁机制在民商事纠纷处理机制上的平衡关系。 Independence and final arbitration reflect the basic spirit of the arbitration system. Because of its quasi-judicial features, arbitral awards are also subject to the supervision and restriction of the judicial power of the state. The system of substantive and procedural comprehensive judicial supervision of domestic arbitration established by China’s Arbitration Law has the possibility of improper supervision in reality, more importantly, it is in conflict with the nature of the arbitration system and the balance with the civil procedure mechanism . From the perspective of system construction, we should change the procedural supervision mechanism of judicial versus arbitration, and ensure the balance of judicial mechanism and arbitration mechanism in civil-commercial dispute resolution mechanism.