经过了过去十几年的发展,当代中国建筑评论逐渐形成了一种学术标准文体,好的方面是规范了学术写作体例,便于学术研究和与国外学术平台对接;然而另一个方面,也造成了建筑评论形式的单调乏味,并形成了一种隐含的壁垒,屏蔽了学科外或体制外的声音。从某个意义上说,这也正是造成公共和专业话语断裂的一个很重要原因。专业的建筑评论通过“术语”和“行话”将自身加密,没有接受过专业或者一定素质训练的人无从跨过这个壁垒得以顺畅的阅读。文字和语言(背后所隐藏的是一种阶级品位)成为筛选读者受众的标准,读 After more than ten years of development, contemporary Chinese architectural reviews have gradually formed an academic standard style. The good aspects are standardizing the academic writing style, facilitating academic research and docking with foreign academic platforms. On the other hand, The tedium of architectural reviews forms an implicit barrier that shields outside or outside the system. This is, in a way, a very important reason for the breakdown of public and professional discourse. Professional architectural reviews encrypt themselves by “terminology” and “jargon”, and no one who has received professional or quality training can not read smoothly across this barrier. Text and language (hidden behind is a class taste) become the standard for screening audiences, reading