我们教评论课的教师,在讲到论证的时候,常常面对同学的一种怀疑:那些形式逻辑方法和规则,对于真实发生在人们日常生活中,尤其是公共生活中的意见交流和论争来说,有用吗?这种怀疑是有道理的。因为人们确实很少在评论作品和辩论活动中直接看到形式逻辑的印记。不像20 When we talk about argumentation, teachers who teach our review class often face the suspicion of their classmates that those formal logic methods and rules are meant to exchange opinions and debate about what really happened in people’s daily life, especially in public life Say, useful? This skepticism makes sense. Because people do seldom see the mark of formal logic in the comments and debates. Unlike 20