论文部分内容阅读
网络舆论与刑事司法决策是互为作用和动态的关系。在互动关系中,任何一方都是在假定为理性经济人角色的情形下,在公共领域中的交流都需要投入一定的成本以实现其自身利益最大化,同时在自身内部同样存在着利益博弈关系。对网络舆论来讲,网络大众的集体行动具有凝聚力是经济性的选择;对刑事司法活动而言,司法主体决策机制的合理构建与运行是经济性的选择。当二者相遇面临利益博弈时,刑事司法主体放低理性的姿态,网络大众收敛感性的冲动,主张平等话语功能才是二者良性互动产生最佳经济性的选择。
Internet public opinion and criminal justice decision-making are interactive and dynamic relationship. In the interactive relationship, any party assumes the role of a rational economic man, and exchanges in the public domain need to invest a certain amount of cost to maximize their own interests. At the same time, there is also a game of interest between themselves . As far as the network public opinion is concerned, the cohesive action of the mass public collective action is an economic choice. For the criminal judicial activities, the rational construction and operation of the judicial body decision-making mechanism is an economic choice. When the two encounter the game of interest, the main body of criminal justice to reduce the rational attitude of the network mass convergence of the impulse to advocate the equal discourse function is the two benign interaction produce the best choice for economy.