论文部分内容阅读
在以往的批评文献中,麦琪·野火在很多评论家眼里无足轻重,即便论及,也多半被当作分析其他人物的比照对象。此乃司各特小说研究中的一个不小的审美疏忽。本文以为,这一人物甚为重要,从人物形象塑造的角度看,虽存有朦胧空缺,但符合理据,不失真实可信;从文本构建功能的角度看,她处于整部小说叙事结构的关键位置,勾连了故事两大情节板块,链接了小说中的所有主要人物;从历史史实与虚构小说的关系看,她是两者之间的媒介,是司各特将故事植入历史土壤的得力工具。
In the past criticism, Maggie Wildfire in the eyes of many critics insignificant, even if discussed, mostly used as the analysis of other people’s reference. This is a novelist negligence in Scott’s novels. This article thinks that this character is very important. From the angle of the character image, though it has a vague vacancy, it is in conformity with the rationale without any loss of truth and credibility. From the perspective of text construction, she is in the narrative structure of the whole novel Key location, linked to the story of two major sections of the plot, linking all the major characters in the novel; from the historical facts and fictional relationship, she is the media between the two, Scott is the story into the historical soil Effective tool.