论文部分内容阅读
目的 TOPSIS法和RSR法相结合对县级疾控机构开展综合绩效评价提供手段条件,为了解三明市十二县区疾控机构取得的工作成效和综合能效提供依据。方法采用三明市县级疾控机构2012年8类35个项目101个指标的绩效考核评估得分,应用TOPSIS理想解排序及RSR分档法结合对其进行综合绩效的分析评价。结果经TOPSIS法计算Ci值按顺序排名结合RSR法分档比较,三明市十二县(市、区)的疾控机构2012年综合绩效评价为:宁化、永安、泰宁为优,尤溪、沙县、建宁、梅列、大田、清流为良,三元、将乐、明溪为一般。方差分析F=19.310,P<0.05,方差齐性检验:P=0.230>0.05。结论应用TOPSIS理想解排序法和RSR秩和比法相结合评价三明市县级疾控机构的综合绩效,在统计分析方法上较好地解决了两者应用的局限性,评价结果与实际情况较为相符,可较好地解决评估得分的客观科学性,对稳步提高绩效评估考核工作质量具有较高的推广应用价值。
Objective TOPSIS method combined with RSR method provides the conditions for the county CDCs to carry out comprehensive performance evaluation, and provides the basis for understanding the work effectiveness and comprehensive energy efficiency achieved by the CDC in Sanming City. Methods The score of performance appraisal of 101 indicators of 35 items in 8 categories of 8 categories in 2012 by CDC of Sanming City was analyzed. The TOPSIS ideal solution and RSR method were used to analyze and evaluate the comprehensive performance. Results The Ci value calculated by TOPSIS method was ranked according to the rank order. Compared with the RSR method, the comprehensive performance evaluation of CDC institutions in 12 counties (cities and districts) of Sanming City in 2012 was: Ninghua, Yong’an and Taining, , Shaxian, Jianning, Mellitus, Daejeon, clean good, ternary, music, Ming Creek as a general. ANOVA F = 19.310, P <0.05, homogeneity of variance test: P = 0.230> 0.05. Conclusion The combination of TOPSIS method and RSR rank sum method is used to evaluate the comprehensive performance of CDC in Sanming City. The statistical analysis method can well solve the limitations of the two applications. The evaluation results are in good agreement with the actual situation , Which can objectively solve the scientificalness of evaluation scores and has a high popularization and application value for steadily improving the quality of performance appraisal and examination work.